Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DANA_MB
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190521
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '20 at 19:48
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Memory 89 1-Core 125 2-Core 248 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 653 70% 557 Pts	64-Core 757 47% 757 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 2001) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.11% Terrible	Lighting 7.3 Reflection 10.6 Parallax 7.56 6% 8.49 fps	MRender 12 Gravity 6.7 Splatting 14.5 9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.11% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q) 36,643 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.59 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Lighting 59.7 Reflection 65.6 Parallax 57.3 49% 60.9 fps	MRender 68.5 Gravity 57.8 Splatting 59.2 50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE128HMGR-00000 128GB 239 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT2300Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 30 28 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 369 Write 38.3 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 28.4 27% 124 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 18 82% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 352 DQ Write 51.6 DQ Mixed 38.2 70% 147 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 79%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 64GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 300 236 233 231 228 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 467 Mixed 432 SusWrite 282 94% 420 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 81.2 4K Mixed 52.5 170% 57.8 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 346 261% 349 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 133%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 6.5TB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 34.2 Write 38.5 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 40.9 27% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.7 236% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 22.5 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 30.6 SC Mixed 26.3 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,059x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,066x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,444x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	595x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	397x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	248x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,752x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16