Asus K72Jr

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAsus K72Jr  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K72Jr
Memory2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '20 at 18:19
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 56.9
2-Core 100
46% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 145
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Asus(1043 1BF2) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM501II 500GB-$100
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 49 42 46 9.5 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 70.1
Write 77.5
Mixed 35
SusWrite 36.9
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1B1672EG 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 10.9
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K72Jr Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K72Jr

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $227
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback