Acer Swift SF114-32

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Swift SF114-32  (all builds)
MotherboardGLK Sapporo_GL
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190927
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 24 '20 at 07:43
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43% Average
Memory 48.4
1-Core 55.7
2-Core 108
41% 70.9 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 216
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Acer(1025 126A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.37% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 3.15
Parallax 2.31
2% 2.54 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 5.91
4% 4.11 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.37%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1014 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 402 390 397 384 389 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 429
Write 376
Mixed 384
SusWrite 401
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 45.6
142% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 452
DQ Write 385
DQ Mixed 420
314% 419 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 105%
Great: 180%
SanDisk Cruzer Contour 16GB
3GB free, PID 540e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 13 14 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
7.64% Terrible
Read 25.2
Write 11.2
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 14.4
18% 15 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.64%
Great: 11%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
22GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 33 34 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 120
Write 47.4
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 33.3
55% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
14% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 111%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7
17GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 42 30 31 31 30 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 132
Write 94.3
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 42.3
116% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2
161% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 12
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.3
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF114-32 Builds (Compare 210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF114-32

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback