HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	29.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110802
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '20 at 21:51
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X2 B55 662 User benchmarks, average bench 47% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Memory 80 1-Core 38.5 2-Core 68.7 43% 62.4 Pts	4-Core 68 8-Core 69.8 9% 68.9 Pts	64-Core 72.9 4% 72.9 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570 19,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Sapphire(174B E193) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.39% Terrible	Lighting 7.17 Reflection 6.96 Parallax 5.81 6% 6.65 fps	MRender 5.62 Gravity 5.27 Splatting 5.65 4% 5.51 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.39% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 136 118 142 154 176 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.3% Poor	Read 166 Write 95 Mixed 79.7 SusWrite 148 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 16.4 4K Mixed 10.3 42% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 17.3 DQ Write 18.5 DQ Mixed 15.7 12% 17.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 100%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 20GB free Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 97 62 55 56 58 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.8% Below average	Read 62.2 Write 194 Mixed 185 SusWrite 79.4 30% 130 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 41.4 4K Mixed 25.2 86% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 116 91% 126 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 82%
Seagate ST3160316AS 160GB 1,028 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 29GB free Firmware: HP63 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 43 25 40 48 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 66.4 Write 54.8 Mixed 41.2 SusWrite 39.4 37% 50.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 56%
Sabrent Disk Dev 500GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 147GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 36.8 Write 33.6 Mixed 26.6 SusWrite 0.4 18% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 80%
Sabrent Disk Dev 4TB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 29 31 31 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 35.6 Mixed 32.2 SusWrite 30.6 24% 32.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 110%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 200GB free, PID 2567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 97 104 107 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.5% Below average	Read 106 Write 96 Mixed 70.8 SusWrite 102 125% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 48% 0.73 MB/s

Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 29GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	1.15% Terrible	Read 0.5 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 0.3 1% 0.45 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 1.15% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 98 HP497157-D88-ELCG ID:01 98 HP497157-D88-ELCG 37GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 33792 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 6.4 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6.4 16% 5.67 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

CPU
Athlon II X2 B24AMDBench 42%, 2,045 samples	53x
Phenom II X4 B95AMDBench 53%, 2,408 samples	44x
Phenom II X4 B97AMDBench 55%, 1,103 samples	22x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	150x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	17x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G 49GBUnknownBench 33%, 13 samples	4x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 37GBUnknownBench 28%, 75 samples	3x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 37GBUnknownBench 29%, 75 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16