To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	66.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20190119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '20 at 13:41
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 91.4 2-Core 178 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 654 59% 496 Pts	64-Core 844 52% 844 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3757) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Lighting 83 Reflection 82.3 Parallax 80.5 68% 81.9 fps	MRender 82.6 Gravity 76.1 Splatting 74.8 63% 77.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 60%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme ADATA SX8200PNP 256GB 1,186 User benchmarks, average bench 206% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: R090 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 256 258 257 255 257 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	179% Outstanding	Read 1,745 Write 909 Mixed 389 SusWrite 258 180% 825 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 151 4K Mixed 74.2 225% 86.1 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 718 DQ Mixed 177 224% 383 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 255%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70QB0- M393B1K70QB0- M393B1K70QB0- 32GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 48.3 MC Write 41.1 MC Mixed 41.9 125% 43.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12.2 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	707x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	614x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	101x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16