PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Fill Q7700 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130808 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 23 '20 at 13:27 |
Run Duration | 192 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 60% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
|
70%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 550-$79
PowerColor(148C 2390) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1190 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.2
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 51 22 87 21 115 MB/s
|
31.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
115GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 92 118 102 122 115 MB/s
|
72.1%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
295GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 160 169 169 174 175 MB/s
|
80.6%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
298GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 67 70 68 69 70 MB/s
|
38.5%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
98GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 96 95 95 95 MB/s
|
46.8%
Average
|
|||
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 9.1 8.6 8.4 7.9 9 MB/s
|
5.22%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470SIntelBench 65%, 14,631 samples | 2x |
Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples | 1x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples | 2x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 1x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 12% - Very poor | Total price: $35 |