PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Toshiba TECRA M11 (all builds) |
Motherboard | TOSHIBA Portable PC |
Memory | 0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100729 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Mar 02 '17 at 14:01 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 60% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
41.4%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia NVS 2100M
Toshiba(1179 0002) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 327.2
|
0.8%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HTS725032A9A360 320GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PC3O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
10.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 M 520Intel $70Bench 40%, 23,644 samples | 13x |
Core i7 M 620IntelBench 42%, 9,076 samples | 5x |
Core i5 M 560Intel $65Bench 41%, 10,722 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 18x |
NVS 2100MNvidiaBench 1%, 481 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 48% - Average | Total price: $108 |