Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '20 at 00:06
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 154
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 456
45% 365 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 46 3 21 2.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 409
Write 159
Mixed 240
SusWrite 16
45% 206 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 30.9
102% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 59.8
77% 142 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
242GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 155 155 151 147 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 150
Write 152
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 152
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 18.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 14.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback