Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics89.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory43.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '20 at 20:44
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 41.5
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 39.8
38% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 272
30% 236 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon-VII-$841
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.3% Excellent
Lighting 98.9
Reflection 97.7
Parallax 196
81% 131 fps
MRender 97.3
Gravity 144
Splatting 141
106% 127 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
823GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4SANA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 681 730 713 629 683 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 821
Write 601
Mixed 162
SusWrite 648
124% 558 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 21.5
69% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 253
190% 258 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 106%
Great: 373%
OCZ VERTEX2 240GB
132GB free
Firmware: 1.37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 78 84 86 76 83 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16% Very poor
Read 120
Write 78.6
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 81.6
20% 91 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 6
20% 6.37 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 16%
Great: 78%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 103 105 108 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 82.8
Write 109
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 106
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 67%
Kingston DataTraveler SE9 USB 2.0 16GB-$5
14GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.6 3.3 3.2 2.9 3.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Read 17
Write 9.2
Mixed 12
SusWrite 3.1
13% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 21.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 9
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $933
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback