PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Biostar H61MHV2 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200218 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 20 '20 at 17:40 |
Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
Run User | PRT-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
|
62.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 194 215 218 218 219 MB/s
|
55.5%
Above average
|
|||
Kingston DT Micro 16GB
4GB free, PID 168a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.8 5.6 4.9 5 5.5 MB/s
|
3.08%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
46.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 17x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 14x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 12x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 13x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $221 |