Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150723
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Mar 01 '17 at 08:47
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 85.7 2-Core 178 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 339 46% 342 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Lighting 43.9 Reflection 34.4 Parallax 42.6 36% 40.3 fps	MRender 47.9 Gravity 41.9 Splatting 39.8 35% 43.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 169 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 69 (64) Unknown 100 100 267392 (65) Unknown 100 100 70192 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 157 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 589 (B7) Unknown 100 100 3 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 100 171800002590 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 491 (EA) Unknown 100 100 287 (F1) Unknown 100 100 426 (F2) Unknown 100 100 348 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	57% Above average	Read 452 Write 169 Mixed 212 61% 278 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 9.74 71% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 8.62 54% 129 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 637GB free Firmware: HP34 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 218147568 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1598 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 4517311573 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8621 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1696 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1509813026 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 5 (BD) vendor-specific 95 95 5 (BE) vendor-specific 71 45 4800184349 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 293 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 71 71 58845 (C2) HDA temperature 29 55 -140737488355299 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	97.4% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 173 Mixed 162 126% 167 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.34 110% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 73,650 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 17.7 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 15.8 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0 - $21

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	190x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	139x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	119x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	125x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	85x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	76x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	64x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	45x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	28x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	24x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16