Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 20 '20 at 15:53
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 90.8
46% 70.5 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 160
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Asus(1043 836D) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 3.47
4% 4.23 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 64 65 63 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 326
Write 71.8
Mixed 102
SusWrite 62.9
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 28.3
100% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 67.6
DQ Mixed 88.9
66% 89 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
246GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 102 99 101 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 91
Write 101
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 100
63% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 77%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
842GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 99.4
Write 93.5
Mixed 63.7
64% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 57%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
11GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 4.6 5.1 5 5 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
7.12% Terrible
Read 27.6
Write 7
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 5.2
14% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 2
94% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.12%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.5% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 11.4
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.9
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback