Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Memory 7.97 1-Core 50 2-Core 99.5 25% 52.5 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 167 20% 152 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.33% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 3.38 Parallax 2.25 2% 2.62 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 5.91 3% 3.81 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.33% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKF180H6H 180GB 517 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: LSF034N SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 87 70 70 71 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	74% Very good	Read 457 Write 343 Mixed 345 SusWrite 96.6 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 37.6 122% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 218 175% 245 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	24.4% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 423 10% 423 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	67x
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	36x
N100IntelBench 48%, 1,491 samples	11x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	111x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 1,086 samples	11x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples	9x

SSD
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples	41x
S535N8/256GYN 256GBNetacBench 60%, 120 samples	12x
RBUSNS8180S3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 68%, 456 samples	12x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16