PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B79 |
Motherboard | MSI X470 GAMING PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 3.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180628 |
Uptime | 1.5 Days |
Run Date | Jun 20 '20 at 06:10 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
70.7%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
59%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 112 95 93 94 93 MB/s
|
93.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
374GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 149 150 149 148 150 MB/s
|
77.9%
Very good
|
|||
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 35 36 MB/s
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 1,167x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 744x |
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $195Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 641x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 320x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 282x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 224x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $712 |