Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA530
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190516
Uptime	16.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '20 at 22:28
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	66%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 41.5 2-Core 147 57% 93.3 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 376 32% 275 Pts	64-Core 653 40% 653 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2004) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	4.03% Terrible	Lighting 2.53 Reflection 12 Parallax 2.78 2% 5.78 fps	MRender 9.62 Gravity 7.33 Splatting 11.2 8% 9.38 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.03% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 389GB free (System drive) Firmware: C490903 SusWrite @10s intervals: 653 360 389 425 357 373 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 1,256 Write 345 Mixed 574 SusWrite 426 143% 651 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 78.3 4K Mixed 21.4 116% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 15.1 DQ Mixed 131 104% 155 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 228%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 256GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 364 420 431 417 377 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 364 Write 377 Mixed 365 SusWrite 394 85% 375 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 44.5 4K Mixed 23.6 86% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 315 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 300 227% 304 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	MC Read 29 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 22.3 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 19.7 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,019x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	442x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	273x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	271x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	156x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	114x
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	61x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	761x
HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GBKingstonBench 85%, 10,266 samples	31x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 81%, 6,948 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16