| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Gigabyte A320M-H |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1862 x 1036 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190823 |
| Uptime | 7.7 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 19 '20 at 14:44 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 56% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.8%
Good
|
62% 108 Pts
|
44% 341 Pts
|
25% 400 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.5%
Below average
|
31% 34.7 fps
|
30% 36.6 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.7%
Below average
|
32% 11.3 GB/s
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
39% 102 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,888 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 332x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 325x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 283x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 225x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 192x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 171x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $233 |