Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '20 at 12:01
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 154
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 287
38% 286 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Zotac(19DA 7046) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 0.84
2% 2.58 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 1.73
Splatting 2.78
2% 2.81 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 242 248 253 249 255 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 453
Write 258
Mixed 276
SusWrite 248
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 27
92% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 182
144% 195 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 71%
Great: 123%
WD WD6400AAVS-00G9B1 640GB
475GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 83 83 84 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 77
Write 72
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 82.6
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 48%
WD WD6400AAVS-00G9B1 640GB
592GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 89.3
Write 85.8
Mixed 52
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 48%
CT250MX5 00SSD1 250GB
102GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 33
Write 26.3
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 14.2
33% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 6.6
484% 6.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 350%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13
58GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
9.6% Terrible
Read 31.3
Write 24
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 14
31% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
48% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.6%
Great: 38%
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate USB 3.0 16GB-$44
11GB free, PID 1656
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 14 14 14 14 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.24% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 17.3
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 12.9
22% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
68% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.24%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BD186DJ.M8F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 18.5
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 59%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $575
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback