| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190514 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 18 '20 at 22:16 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | PER-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
85.6%
Excellent
|
88% 157 Pts
|
62% 468 Pts
|
30% 479 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 22F9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.7%
Above average
|
52% 72.9 fps
|
50% 62.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QSSBC827240GTS 240GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BC0705A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 65 18 23 63 37 MB/s
|
33.3%
Below average
|
32% 145 MB/s
|
74% 31.7 MB/s
|
21% 42.8 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
207GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 105 105 105 105 MB/s
|
60%
Above average
|
67% 91.3 MB/s
|
176% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.6%
Very good
|
71% 24.9 GB/s
|
60% 20.9 GB/s
|
60% 66.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H310CM-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,133 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $101Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 332x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 153x |
| Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 66x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 88x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 73x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 71x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $284 |