Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N2600 2,255 User benchmarks, average bench 22% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	24.9% Poor	Memory 46.3 1-Core 7 2-Core 12.5 18% 21.9 Pts	4-Core 23.1 8-Core 23 3% 23 Pts	64-Core 23.3 1% 23.3 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 25%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 1,010 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 061F) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.8.1075 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.47% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.34 1% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.47% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CHN-25SATAC3-120 120GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFQE1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 67 67 68 69 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.2% Poor	Read 212 Write 83.6 Mixed 118 SusWrite 66.2 27% 120 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 16.4 4K Mixed 5.1 37% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 69.6 DQ Write 71.6 DQ Mixed 41.5 39% 60.9 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GB 2,805 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 666 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.1 11% 3.73 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.5 8% 2.67 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Atom N2600IntelBench 22%, 2,255 samples	1x

GPU
Graphics Media Accelerator 3600IntelBench 0%, 1,010 samples	1x

RAM
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 1x2GBNanyaBench 17%, 1,374 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16