Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics83.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 16 '20 at 05:06
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 159
2-Core 312
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1191
104% 883 Pts
64-Core 2,211
137% 2,211 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1610 MHz, MLim: 930 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Lighting 97.8
Reflection 90.8
Parallax 137
80% 109 fps
MRender 89.7
Gravity 104
Splatting 129
91% 108 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 187 176 171 179 186 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 451
Write 386
Mixed 334
SusWrite 206
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 30.2
126% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 202
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
103GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 406 403 408 410 402 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 385
Mixed 376
SusWrite 400
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 52.7
154% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 100%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HDN726040ALE614 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 140 138 133 139 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 141
Write 140
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 138
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80%
Great: 113%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 157 159 164 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 172
Mixed 104
SusWrite 160
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1
312% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 105%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
682GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 89 89 91 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 93.5
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 89
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 51%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
847GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 81 80 82 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 87.5
Write 75.5
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 81.2
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 67%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
53GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 39 20 21 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 160
Write 41.2
Mixed 62
SusWrite 30.4
80% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2
142% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36%
Great: 39%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
5.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 177 177 174 173 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 181
Write 191
Mixed 194
SusWrite 176
256% 186 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 3.4
287% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 103%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
24GB free, PID null, Sandisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB £5 Amazon
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 139
Write 17.5
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 17.4
42% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.4
99% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 36%
Generic Mass-Storage 4GB
3GB free, PID null, Sandisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 11 11 11 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 9.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 10.4
14% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4400 C19 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 53.1
MC Write 47.6
MC Mixed 48.7
142% 49.8 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 43
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 133%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,486
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback