Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 64.4 2-Core 124 56% 89.7 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 391 39% 318 Pts	64-Core 919 57% 919 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 093D) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.03% Terrible	Lighting 8.9 Reflection 8.42 Parallax 10.5 7% 9.28 fps	MRender 12.4 Gravity 10.8 Splatting 11.7 10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.03% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB 1,666 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 216 214 216 216 217 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 452 Write 318 Mixed 206 SusWrite 219 66% 299 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 56.1 4K Mixed 35.5 112% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 221 202% 310 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix-00AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 8x8GB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	83% Excellent	MC Read 37.4 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 31.3 96% 33.6 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.2 21% 7.5 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	96x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	82x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	62x

RAM
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	41x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	39x
M393B1G70BH0-YK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 67%, 378 samples	24x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $170

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16