Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq dc7900 Small Form Factor (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3031h
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit, Χρώματα 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151022
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '20 at 20:48
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8300 1,428 User benchmarks, average bench 41% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Memory 54.6 1-Core 39.4 2-Core 72.3 35% 55.4 Pts	4-Core 68.9 8-Core 57.9 9% 63.4 Pts	64-Core 64.4 4% 64.4 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset 16,152 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 3034) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.48% Terrible	Lighting 0.57 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.62 0% 0.56 fps	MRender 0.48 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 0.83 0% 0.59 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.48% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB 22,489 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 107 55 57 53 63 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.1% Poor	Read 125 Write 155 Mixed 146 SusWrite 78 28% 126 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 10.2 42% 13.2 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 128 102% 143 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 83%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43 15,932 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 148GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 98 103 102 97 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 99.4 Write 100 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 98 66% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 58%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 393GB free, PID 2509 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 26 26 24 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 26.8 Write 26.5 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 24.5 34% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 40GB 7,939 User benchmarks, average bench 22% null MHz 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 5 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 4.7 13% 4.7 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	139x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	18x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	17x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	139x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	23x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	12x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	4x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	3x

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $121

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16