Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9300-$70 3,287 User benchmarks, average bench 38% U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Memory 58.6 1-Core 27.5 2-Core 59.9 33% 48.7 Pts	4-Core 62.3 8-Core 62.7 8% 62.5 Pts	64-Core 65.5 4% 65.5 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family 3,066 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 30D8) 384MB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1930 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.16% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.15 Parallax 0.28 0% 0.25 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.16% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 166 68 99 95 68 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.7% Below average	Read 225 Write 194 Mixed 24.3 SusWrite 113 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 11.9 4K Mixed 16.7 54% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 45 57% 102 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	13% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 4.1 13% 4.5 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 0.1 4% 1.3 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16