HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory	6.6 GB free of 10.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '20 at 16:29
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Memory 83.2 1-Core 50.5 2-Core 99 50% 77.6 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 192 26% 191 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Lighting 71.2 Reflection 71.3 Parallax 96.5 58% 79.7 fps	MRender 71.9 Gravity 71.4 Splatting 59.3 54% 67.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 46 30 25 26 15 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.9% Poor	Read 164 Write 97.5 Mixed 112 SusWrite 27.1 22% 100 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 11.6 4K Mixed 12.4 50% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 21.2 DQ Write 8.8 DQ Mixed 0.6 4% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 87%
Hitachi HTS545032A7E380 320GB 4,858 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 19GB free Firmware: GGBOA7A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 40 44 44 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 44.7 Write 41.2 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 43 27% 37 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 AD HMT451U6BFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 46GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048, 36864 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 10.2 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.5 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

CPU
Athlon II X2 B24AMDBench 42%, 2,045 samples	53x
Phenom II X4 B95AMDBench 53%, 2,408 samples	44x
Phenom II X4 B97AMDBench 55%, 1,103 samples	22x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	150x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	17x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G 49GBUnknownBench 33%, 13 samples	4x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 37GBUnknownBench 28%, 75 samples	3x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 37GBUnknownBench 29%, 75 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16