Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX705GM
Memory	26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180921
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '20 at 22:07
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Memory 93.1 1-Core 127 2-Core 252 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 496 8-Core 824 81% 660 Pts	64-Core 1,005 62% 1,005 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1B4E) 3GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4614 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Lighting 63.7 Reflection 71.2 Parallax 63.7 52% 66.2 fps	MRender 69.7 Gravity 58.8 Splatting 68.6 54% 65.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 383GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 784 886 749 626 99 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	162% Outstanding	Read 1,011 Write 925 Mixed 808 SusWrite 597 188% 835 MB/s	4K Read 46.5 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 59.3 201% 69.5 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 700 DQ Mixed 221 252% 416 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 209%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 125 131 129 123 128 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 39.8 Write 81.7 Mixed 52.3 SusWrite 126 55% 74.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.2 207% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 32GB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2667, 2667 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	MC Read 32.8 MC Write 34.4 MC Mixed 27.1 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 36.9 SC Mixed 26.8 79% 27.7 GB/s	Latency 61.9 65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	577x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	46x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	324x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	299x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	186x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	110x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	53x

RAM
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	141x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	119x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	59x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16