Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	5.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka) 31,243 User benchmarks, average bench 42% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Memory 36.5 1-Core 48.2 2-Core 76 32% 53.6 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 139 18% 134 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Elitegroup(1019 1025) 2GB CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	5.64% Terrible	Lighting 6.93 Reflection 7.46 Parallax 8.34 6% 7.58 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 7.77 Splatting 7.52 6% 6.72 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.64% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109 10,807 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2333000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 162 155 156 162 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 330 Write 168 Mixed 168 SusWrite 158 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 10.6 76% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 21.9 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 60.6 54% 77.2 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 71%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 863GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 171 175 170 174 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 162 Mixed 110 SusWrite 172 114% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U13C9G Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 10GB 1333, 1600 MHz 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.5% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.77 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 6.1 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 220 18% 220 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16