PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LX (all builds) |
Memory | 1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130918 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 14 '20 at 20:42 |
Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
Run User | MYS-User |
Background CPU | 62% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-3240
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
42.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 106 100 106 109 106 MB/s
|
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
220GB free
Firmware: JC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 81 81 100 99 MB/s
|
55.6%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
|
36.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 184x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 148x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 120x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 210x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 69x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 60x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $77 |