Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Memory 66.2 1-Core 13.3 2-Core 16.7 27% 32.1 Pts	4-Core 27.1 8-Core 24.3 4% 25.7 Pts	64-Core 21.7 1% 21.7 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C648) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.52% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.72 0% 0.75 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 0.96 1% 0.68 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.52% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 77 81 87 92 84 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.7% Poor	Read 151 Write 103 Mixed 108 SusWrite 85.2 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 13.1 4K Mixed 6.1 28% 9.37 MB/s	DQ Read 50 DQ Write 40.1 DQ Mixed 33.2 28% 41.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HB3SU004GFM8MMB33 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.8% Very poor	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 4 9% 3.23 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 2.8 5% 1.77 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 11%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 13%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

SSD
N18A 480GBSSDBench 71%, 72 samples	9x
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	2x
CS90 0 240GB SSDPNYBench 67%, 400 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 2,491 samples	13x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	3x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B2873FHS-CH9 3GBSamsungBench 25%, 274 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16