Gigabyte GA-X299X DESIGNARE 10G

Performance Results


Gaming 117% UFO	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 131% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299X DESIGNARE 10G (all builds)
Memory	47.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191128
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '20 at 22:12
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$455 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 69.7 1-Core 129 2-Core 253 81% 151 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 971 86% 728 Pts	64-Core 1,700 105% 1,700 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6393) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	146% Outstanding	Lighting 222 Reflection 190 Parallax 178 181% 197 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 172 Splatting 119 111% 138 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 146% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 228 218 210 199 191 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Read 463 Write 259 Mixed 250 SusWrite 216 66% 297 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 96.8 4K Mixed 32.8 136% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 192 178% 278 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 129%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 510GB 1,017 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 289GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1154 1116 1176 1075 1087 1098 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 115%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 191 199 196 192 202 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 202 Write 200 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 197 124% 170 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 1 223% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x16GB 9,153 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	80.9% Excellent	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 44.7 MC Mixed 25.5 92% 32.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 9.2 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299X DESIGNARE 10G Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 112%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299X DESIGNARE 10G

CPU
Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples	48x
Core i9-7980XEIntel $1,511Bench 80%, 4,653 samples	17x
Core i9-10920XIntel $850Bench 87%, 3,007 samples	16x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	12x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	11x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	11x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	8x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	8x

RAM
8x16GBUnknownBench 104%, 2,632 samples	31x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	30x
4x31.8GBUnknownBench 105%, 601 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,466

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16