Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 215-$29 4,513 User benchmarks, average bench 38% AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Memory 65 1-Core 30.4 2-Core 58.9 35% 51.4 Pts	4-Core 58.2 8-Core 69.1 8% 63.7 Pts	64-Core 69.1 4% 69.1 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	63% Good	Lighting 71.2 Reflection 69 Parallax 84 58% 74.7 fps	MRender 90.2 Gravity 98.8 Splatting 80.1 72% 89.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 88%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 906GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 119 150 159 173 160 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.1% Below average	Read 182 Write 165 Mixed 156 SusWrite 145 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 13.7 4K Mixed 14.8 52% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 59.4 DQ Mixed 37.5 30% 41.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	23% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 8.5 23% 7.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

SSD
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	2x
CS1311 480GBPNY $31Bench 86%, 13,149 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 480GBKingston $250Bench 52%, 15,510 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16