PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7A39 |
Motherboard | MSI A320M GRENADE (MS-7A39) (all builds) |
Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180710 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Jun 12 '20 at 15:38 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 96% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD PRO A6-9500 R5, 8 COMPUTE CORES 2C+6G
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
31%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3212) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 87 86 109 121 111 MB/s
|
39.5%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.C8FHP Kingston 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
13.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 25x |
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 21x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 20x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 26x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 17x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 13x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 101% - Outstanding | Total price: $240 |