ECS IC55H-A

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	ECS IC55H-A (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100811
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '20 at 11:57
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3470 8,730 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 73.5 2-Core 126 60% 95.8 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 272 30% 240 Pts	64-Core 309 19% 309 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	47.2% Average	Lighting 57.5 Reflection 64 Parallax 75.1 47% 65.5 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 57.8 Splatting 54.8 48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE360000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 52 32 36 36 50 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.9% Very poor	Read 80.8 Write 48 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 36.5 9% 42.7 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 12.7 36% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 19 DQ Write 26.3 DQ Mixed 21 16% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 53%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 202GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 97 99 99 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 106 Write 96 Mixed 52.8 SusWrite 97.4 64% 88 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 175 176 174 174 177 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 176 Mixed 38 SusWrite 175 102% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	32.5% Below average	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 11 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 6.5 23% 8.17 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical IC55H-A Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: ECS IC55H-A

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	6x
Xeon X3470IntelBench 69%, 8,730 samples	3x
Core i5 661Intel $80Bench 50%, 2,457 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	3x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	2x
HD 5850AMDBench 15%, 15,020 samples	1x

SSD
250GB 250GBSSDBench 61%, 6 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	1x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	6x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	3x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16