Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Memory 28.4 1-Core 44.8 2-Core 89.6 30% 54.3 Pts	4-Core 177 8-Core 177 24% 177 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Lighting 15 Reflection 13.8 Parallax 16.7 12% 15.1 fps	MRender 15.7 Gravity 18.3 Splatting 19.5 15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Shinedisk M746 128G 120GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1007C SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 146 153 155 156 158 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 457 Write 158 Mixed 215 SusWrite 152 54% 246 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 29.2 95% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 159 130% 188 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5402-455.A00LF 1302 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.5% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 10.2 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.23 GB/s	Latency 264 15% 264 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	36x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	27x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	6x
GeForce G210NvidiaBench 1%, 3,988 samples	1x

SSD
Q Series Pro 256GBToshiba $109Bench 85%, 1,725 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	3x

RAM
CT51264BD160BJ.C8F 1x4GBUndeBench 20%, 11 samples	4x
L22 02/2012 ACC 1352 8GBUndeBench 30%, 6 samples	3x
99U5584-009.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 31%, 2 samples	2x

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $109

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16