Medion Erazer X5309 F/B554

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion Erazer X5309 F/B554  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7848
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '20 at 17:11
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 171
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 339
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3203) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.6% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 42.3
Parallax 38.1
35% 41.2 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 34
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 111 110 108 101 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 429
Write 320
Mixed 318
SusWrite 127
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 39.9
143% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 148
138% 208 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47
135GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 72
Write 41.7
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 72.1
43% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 40%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
340GB free
Firmware: CC56
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 151 152 153 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 145
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 151
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 112%
Generic- Multi-Card 128GB
79GB free, PID 0158
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 20.8
Write 20.5
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 20.9
27% 20 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.4
229% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18.7
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 17.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer X5309 F/B554 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Medion Erazer X5309 F/B554

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $449
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback