Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Memory 48 1-Core 21.6 2-Core 41.3 26% 37 Pts	4-Core 41.8 8-Core 43.8 6% 42.8 Pts	64-Core 42.5 3% 42.5 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2060) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.56% Terrible	Lighting 1.67 Reflection 2.19 Parallax 2.38 1% 2.08 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 2.87 2% 2.32 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.56% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA500CM10003 500GB 6,074 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 396GB free (System drive) Firmware: STRSD013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 306 358 360 382 373 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 418 Write 402 Mixed 388 SusWrite 353 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 33.8 104% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 90.9 DQ Mixed 96.5 73% 97.2 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 136%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1KFG/8G 1x8GB 1,789 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 5.8 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16