Lenovo 20AWA196PB

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

CPU throttled at 5% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Lenovo 20AWA196PB (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 20AWA196PB
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180927
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '20 at 21:59
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	8%
CPU Throttled	5%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150 22,632 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 59.6 1-Core 24 2-Core 47.3 31% 43.6 Pts	4-Core 81.5 8-Core 124 13% 103 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730M 2,897 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 220F) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9125 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	4.62% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 5.42 Parallax 6.12 4% 5.68 fps	MRender 5.76 Gravity 5.9 Splatting 6.13 5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.62% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 500GB 3,936 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 384 399 246 75 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 453 Write 428 Mixed 357 SusWrite 264 84% 376 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 49.5 4K Mixed 35.3 117% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 257 DQ Mixed 302 220% 288 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 128%
OCZ Trion 150 960GB-$190 3,375 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 235GB free Firmware: SAFZ SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 388 400 185 283 306 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 406 Write 280 Mixed 169 SusWrite 326 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 36.5 4K Mixed 20.7 72% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 252 DQ Mixed 193 167% 248 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 103%
SC2 M2 SSD 128GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 40GB free Firmware: S9FM SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 88 112 65 84 77 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	52% Above average	Read 445 Write 133 Mixed 194 SusWrite 93.3 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 17.1 80% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 88.8 DQ Mixed 3.6 30% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 Kingston 9905428-155.A00LF 16GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	41.7% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 16.5 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 7.1 17% 5.9 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 20AWA196PB

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)