Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	27% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Opteron 6276 50 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 78.2 1-Core 37 2-Core 95.9 45% 70.4 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 289 28% 232 Pts	64-Core 498 31% 498 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 55%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 117 117 123 124 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27% Poor	Read 112 Write 110 Mixed 99.1 SusWrite 115 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 24.4 4K Mixed 10.9 46% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 20.2 DQ Write 48.9 DQ Mixed 20.4 20% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB 1,328 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 8 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.5% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 7.6 24% 8.23 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.5 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	2x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	2x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	2x

SSD
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	2x
SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 70%, 12,432 samples	1x
2+0 Stripe/RAID0 960GBAMDBench 101%, 182 samples	1x

RAM
M393B1K70CH0-YH9 2x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 50 samples	2x
36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 2x16GBMicronBench 48%, 43 samples	2x
M393B2K70DMB-YH9 2x16GBSamsungBench 30%, 18 samples	2x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $79

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16