Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD C-60 APU 2,297 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	24.7% Poor	Memory 44.9 1-Core 14.6 2-Core 27.5 21% 29 Pts	4-Core 28.4 8-Core 28.9 4% 28.6 Pts	64-Core 28.2 2% 28.2 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6290 2,442 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0598) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 0.57 Reflection 0.85 Parallax 0.72 0% 0.71 fps	MRender 1.14 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 0.91 1% 0.84 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 187 190 214 198 163 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 547 Write 443 Mixed 477 SusWrite 193 93% 415 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 12.6 74% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 49.2 DQ Write 44.6 DQ Mixed 54.7 39% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-068.A00LF 1x8GB 157 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 4.5 11% 3.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 3.2 7% 2.57 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 12%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
C-60 APUAMDBench 23%, 2,297 samples	31x
C-50AMDBench 21%, 1,781 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon HD 6290AMDBench 1%, 2,442 samples	31x
Radeon HD 6250AMDBench 1%, 1,583 samples	6x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	1x
Extreme 120GBSanDisk $160Bench 69%, 11,787 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 21%, 1,324 samples	4x
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 1x2GBKingstonBench 18%, 620 samples	4x
ACR256X64D3S13C9G 1x2GBKingstonBench 21%, 403 samples	4x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16