Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20190412
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '20 at 08:44
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$194 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 96.3 2-Core 188 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 470 50% 397 Pts	64-Core 471 29% 471 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Lighting 68.8 Reflection 67.6 Parallax 91.4 56% 75.9 fps	MRender 65.2 Gravity 65.5 Splatting 55.7 50% 62.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC400 128GB-$75 747 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.Y SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 189 214 215 221 357 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 464 Write 156 Mixed 302 SusWrite 243 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 55.4 4K Mixed 32.7 112% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 31.2 89% 190 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 262GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 148 148 148 144 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 151 Mixed 81 SusWrite 147 104% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 112%
Hitachi HUS724040ALA640 4TB 1,620 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 3.5TB free Firmware: MFAOAB50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 171 171 170 173 172 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 173 Mixed 88.5 SusWrite 171 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.8 174% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	48.6% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 14.9 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.1 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	275x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	238x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16