Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 25.2 1-Core 49.8 2-Core 94.9 30% 56.6 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 156 22% 159 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7988 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.79% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 2 2% 2.57 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 1.78 2% 2.26 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.79% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast 256GB NA950-2280 256GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 153 24 10 22 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	23.8% Poor	Read 360 Write 371 Mixed 298 SusWrite 66.3 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0 20% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	24.3% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 285 14% 285 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	16x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	16x

SSD
256GB NA850-2280 256GBTeclastBench 57%, 288 samples	6x
256GB NA850 256GBTeclastBench 40%, 20 samples	5x
256GB NA950-2280 256GBTeclastBench 47%, 40 samples	3x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16