HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8309
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '20 at 06:00
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 197
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 517
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
HP(103C 8442) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 17
14% 16.2 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 19.4
15% 17.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
88GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 152 68 69 68 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 457
Write 276
Mixed 321
SusWrite 136
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 29.3
122% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 172
153% 227 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 102 141 141 146 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43% Average
Read 18
Write 106
Mixed 48
SusWrite 132
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 43%
Great: 112%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB
61GB free, PID 00d5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 114
Mixed 63.3
88% 88.5 MB/s
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
66% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 35%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
400GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 110 111 91 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
41% Average
Read 110
Write 107
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 103
108% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 31.7
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $299
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback