Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 77.2 1-Core 97.9 2-Core 189 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 444 48% 382 Pts	64-Core 551 34% 551 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 86%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6276) CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.3% Above average	Lighting 61.9 Reflection 64.5 Parallax 64.6 50% 63.6 fps	MRender 49 Gravity 67.6 Splatting 64.9 50% 60.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 88%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 8427) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7757 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.29% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 9.5 Parallax 6.78 5% 7.59 fps	MRender 8.95 Gravity 6.13 Splatting 13.6 8% 9.55 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.29% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 186 185 181 170 168 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 1,172 Write 1,042 Mixed 698 SusWrite 209 174% 780 MB/s	4K Read 41.8 4K Write 96.7 4K Mixed 53.9 184% 64.1 MB/s	DQ Read 892 DQ Write 717 DQ Mixed 765 583% 791 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 236%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 149GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 107 58 57 55 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 1,005 Write 768 Mixed 708 SusWrite 120 145% 650 MB/s	4K Read 43.1 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 43.6 182% 67.4 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 659 DQ Mixed 224 248% 407 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 209%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 597GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 363 381 370 332 341 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Read 408 Write 375 Mixed 348 SusWrite 359 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 31.7 4K Mixed 25.2 79% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 30.5 48% 92.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB 20,226 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 17.4 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 17.1 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 85.9 47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	403x
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 20%, 5,264 samples	265x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 28%, 4,738 samples	71x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	150x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	98x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	79x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	119x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	101x
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	51x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16