PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Z87-K (all builds) |
Memory | 9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130716 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Jun 08 '20 at 08:49 |
Run Duration | 244 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
67.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 525ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 96 98 98 94 93 MB/s
|
56%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
95GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 278 294 293 293 293 MB/s
|
98.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
111GB free
Firmware: 525ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 130 122 122 120 122 MB/s
|
||||
WD Blue 500GB-$84
278GB free
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 273 305 301 290 288 MB/s
|
63.3%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
194GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 285 83 84 83 83 MB/s
|
91.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
528GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 70 70 72 70 71 MB/s
|
35.3%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples | 507x |
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples | 438x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 360x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 169x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 140x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 137x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $412 |