HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory184.5 GB free of 192.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '20 at 01:13
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 181
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 577
58% 470 Pts
64-Core 1,338
83% 1,338 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.2% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 161
Parallax 172
94% 149 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 161
Splatting 109
103% 128 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
744GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 345 363 369 406 453 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 542
Write 437
Mixed 393
SusWrite 388
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 38.3
112% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 377
DQ Mixed 282
222% 301 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 445%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73
749GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 60 45 10 21 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1,497
Write 1,573
Mixed 1,249
SusWrite 66.3
245% 1,096 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 44.4
144% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 550
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 468
344% 456 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 129%
Great: 295%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
40GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 232 196 196 130 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 417
Write 9.2
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 152
32% 149 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 24.5
76% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 189
160% 224 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 133%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
574GB free, PID 0210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 89 89 89 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 93.5
Write 109
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 88.9
112% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 51%
Innostor Ext. HDD 500GB
461GB free, PID 0621
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 72 72 69 75 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 108
Write 48.7
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 70.2
87% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36KDZS2G72PZ-1G6E1 ID:80 2C 36KDZS2G72PZ-1G6E1 ID:80 2C 36KDZS2G72PZ-1G6E1 ID:80 2C 36KDZS2G72PZ-1G6E1 ID:80 2C 36KDZS2G72PZ-1G6E1 ID:80 2C 36KDZS2G72PZ-1G6E1 ID:80 2C 36KDZS2G72PZ-1G6E1 JE... 226GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 34816 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 17.9
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 8.7
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback