Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCasper Casper Nirvana Notebook
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '20 at 00:53
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 158
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 227
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 999C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 8.12
Parallax 5.81
3% 5.85 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.61
5% 5.42 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 417 418 425 428 430 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 421
Mixed 413
SusWrite 417
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 30.5
135% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 46.9
102% 206 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64C8HG0NS-CG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback