Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '20 at 12:06
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 106 2-Core 210 74% 132 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 634 63% 512 Pts	64-Core 860 53% 860 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 874E) ≥ 4GB; tuf CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3033 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.5% Above average	Lighting 75.6 Reflection 72.3 Parallax 61.5 62% 69.8 fps	MRender 66.1 Gravity 72.3 Splatting 56.8 52% 65.1 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GB 2,869 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM01D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 457 469 454 473 437 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 479 Mixed 333 SusWrite 457 99% 441 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 37.9 131% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 150 164% 278 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 466GB free Firmware: MS1OA7S0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 187 187 188 189 188 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 179 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 187 106% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 132% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB 22,274 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 41.4 MC Write 36.3 MC Mixed 34.4 107% 37.4 GB/s	SC Read 23.4 SC Write 36.6 SC Mixed 25.1 81% 28.4 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	836x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	627x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	291x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	295x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	237x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	226x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	101x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	90x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	72x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	179x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	134x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	126x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $476

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16