Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-2100 APU 4,569 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Memory 16.3 1-Core 15.4 2-Core 30.4 12% 20.7 Pts	4-Core 29.4 8-Core 30.6 4% 30 Pts	64-Core 30.6 2% 30.6 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 26%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8210 4,832 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3802) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1045.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.16% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 1.38 1% 1.71 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 2.43 2% 1.91 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.16% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 101 95 97 100 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 368 Write 305 Mixed 312 SusWrite 127 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 20.1 68% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 67.4 DQ Write 63.5 DQ Mixed 67.6 50% 66.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G RMT3170ED58F8W1600 10GB 800, 800 MHz 8192, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 4.7 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 4.1 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 349 12% 349 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 20%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E1-2100 APUAMDBench 17%, 4,569 samples	15x

GPU
HD 8210AMDBench 1%, 4,832 samples	15x

SSD
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples	1x
WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH30 240GBWDCBench 44%, 768 samples	1x
SSD 120GBGigabyte $31Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	2x
RMT3170EB68F9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 27%, 4,598 samples	2x
9905428-401.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 28%, 315 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16