Apple iMac12,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple iMac12,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-942B59F58194171B
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '20 at 08:40
Run Duration65 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500S
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 175
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 286
39% 288 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Apple(106B 6740) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.812.0.0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.8% Terrible
Lighting 8.27
Reflection 8.19
Parallax 6.5
7% 7.65 fps
MRender 8.24
Gravity 5.77
Splatting 10.5
7% 8.18 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.8%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac12,2 Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac12,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $327
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback