HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 835B
Memory	24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190103
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '20 at 07:21
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 Quad-Core 304 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 71.5 1-Core 105 2-Core 196 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 600 57% 470 Pts	64-Core 584 36% 584 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1B0A 90F5) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	7.02% Terrible	Lighting 8.8 Reflection 7.85 Parallax 9.16 7% 8.6 fps	MRender 10.9 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 7.13 7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.02% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-CE128-HP 128GB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3C1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 434 Write 422 Mixed 374 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 60.3 4K Mixed 40.2 133% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 97.8 115% 201 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 84%
VT USB 3.0 128GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 15GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 138 129 136 119 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	42% Average	Read 379 Write 163 Mixed 156 SusWrite 127 45% 206 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 9.3 51% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 93.5 DQ Write 94.5 DQ Mixed 44.8 47% 77.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 52%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 559GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 151 154 157 156 156 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 149 Write 149 Mixed 95.2 SusWrite 154 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC - [0x9B85] CT8G4DFS824A.C8FJ M378A1K43CB2-CRC - [0x9B85] CT8G4DFS824A.C8FJ 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.2% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 25.2 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.5 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 23.1 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 98.1 41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF

CPU
PRO A10-8770 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6GAMDBench 42%, 556 samples	46x
PRO A10-9700 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6GAMDBench 45%, 452 samples	30x
PRO A8-9600 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6GAMDBench 44%, 209 samples	27x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	120x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	29x
Radeon R7 430AMDBench 6%, 939 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
Savage 240GBHyperX $120Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	3x
Array 1 511GBAmd-raidBench 155%, 791 samples	3x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	18x
M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 65%, 7,811 samples	11x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16