Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130427
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '20 at 22:22
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 90.3 2-Core 154 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 335 45% 336 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.24% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 4.15 Parallax 4.91 4% 4.69 fps	MRender 6.48 Gravity 3.93 Splatting 6.13 4% 5.51 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.24% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 71 72 72 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 363 Write 329 Mixed 337 SusWrite 68.6 61% 275 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 34.8 107% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 40.6 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 56.7 48% 67.6 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 662GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 171 172 174 173 171 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 130 Write 150 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 170 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 106%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 655GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 75 80 82 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 73.8 Write 79.6 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 73.8 55% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 67%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 651GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 117 119 118 117 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 133 Write 138 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 117 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 609GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 123 115 115 114 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 164 Write 156 Mixed 41.4 SusWrite 116 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 146% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 652GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 78 78 79 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 82.6 Write 79 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 78.3 55% 74.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 84%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 308GB free Firmware: 3.AFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 72 72 72 72 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 70.9 Write 33.5 Mixed 46.4 SusWrite 71.4 41% 55.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-447.A00LF 2x4GB 1,649 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.6 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 15 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	156x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	120x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	48x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16